As part of a wide-ranging clampdown in the aftermath of the failed July coup, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s administration has urged countries in Eurasia to shut down schools associated with the Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen.
But outside of Azerbaijan, the call does not seem to be swaying Eurasian governments.
Erdogan has publicly accused Gulen supporters of leading the thwarted coup. Accordingly, lots of Gulenists in Turkey have been arrested, and lots more fired from their state jobs. The Turkish government has also classified Gulen’s organization as a terror group.
Erdogan’s animus toward the Gulen movement is such that Turkey has gone to great lengths to get friendly governments in Eurasia, specifically the Turkic-language states in Central Asia, to crack down on suspected Gulenists in their respective countries, as well as shut down Gulen-oriented schools. The Gulen organization made significant inroads into Eurasia in the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Yet, only Azerbaijan, Turkey’s closest regional ally, has launched a full-fledged anti-Gulencampaign. One university in Azerbaijan has been placed under state control, and 50 teachers have been deported. In addition, Azerbaijani authorities have shut down a private TV station, and have alleged that some domestic opposition organizations have ties to the Gulen movement. At least one opposition activist has been arrested under such suspicions.
By contrast, Georgia, the pipeline link between Azerbaijan and Turkey, and Kyrgyzstan, a Turkic Central Asian nation, have so far resisted closing Gulenist schools. Strategic partner Kazakhstan – like Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan, a Turkic cousin – only promised to expel any Turkish Gulenist teachers. The governments of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, two of the most repressive in the world, have long barred Gulenists from operating in their respective countries.
One Gulen researcher posits that, ultimately, Turkey cannot win the campaign against alleged Gulen-linked schools in Eurasia.
Many of the schools in Eurasia have non-Turkish managers, teachers and financing. Thus, there is little that could publicly link these schools to the Gulen movement in Turkey, noted Bayram Balci, an Institut d’etudes politiques de Paris specialist on Islam and Central Asia.
Managers cannot be considered Gulenists in a strict sense because they do not necessarily advocate Gulen’s Islamic principles, Balci reasoned. Meanwhile, many junior staffers have only a vague awareness of the elderly cleric, who now resides in self-imposed exile in Pennsylvania. And many are unfamiliar with Gulen’s writings.
“Gulen schools in some countries are not Turkish anymore, and this specificity will help them to survive,” Balci added.
The situation in Georgia illustrates the challenge for Turkish diplomats. A few days after the July 15 coup attempt, a translation of a TV interview began circulating that featured Yasin Temizkan, Turkey’s consul in the Black Sea city of Batumi. In the interview, Temizkan urged the Georgian government to close the local Refaiddin Sahin Friendship School, a private institution considered part of the Gulen network. The justification, Temizkan said, was that the school was “serving terrorist groups.”
Other Turkish diplomats have made similar appeals worldwide. But in Batumi, angry school staff, teachers and parents demanded a public apology. Five other private Georgian schools, also believed to be Gulen-linked, supported them.
Citing a lack of evidence, Education Minister Aleksandr Jejelava downplayed the matter, but emphasized that Tbilisi does not want “anything to complicate” its “friendship” with Turkey.
That friendship is critical. Turkey ranks as one of Georgia’s largest trade and investment partners.
Turkish Ambassador to Georgia Zeki Levent Gumrukcudeclined to discuss with EursaiaNet.org how Turkey might respond to Georgia’s refusal to close suspected Gulenist schools like ?ahin, calling such a topic “very speculative.” He emphasized that the ultimate decision depends on the government itself.
“We have … very good relations with Georgia. We speak to each other. We share everything with each other and I think that’s the most you can expect out of a relationship,” the ambassador said.
He went on to note that the two sides discussed “everything” about the Gulenist movement – both abroad and in Turkey – during Georgian Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili’s July 19 trip to Ankara and meeting with President Erdogan. The ambassador described the discussions as “an ongoing process.”
The Georgian prime minister’s office did not respond to a request for comment. Kvirikashvili was the first senior foreign official to visit Turkey after the attempted coup – a fact that reflects the two countries’ relationship, Gumrukcu underlined.
Balci suggested that Ankara’s lack of progress in advancing its anti-Gulenist agenda was due in part to a lack of diplomatic “levers against its partners to force them to close Gulen schools.”
Now, there are signs that Turkey may revise its diplomatic approach. Ambassador Gumrukcu earlier announced that the Turkish consul had not meant that ?ahin’s students and graduates themselves were terrorists, and described the consul’s reported remark about presenting the government with evidence on that score as “blown out of its proportions.”
Giorgi Badridze, a former deputy head of mission for the Georgian Embassy in Ankara and a former Georgian ambassador to the United Kingdom, does not believe that differences over the perception of the schools will disrupt good bilateral relations.
“Georgia and Turkey have been close partners for the last 25 years,” Badridze said. “I think our countries will find ways to resolve this issue in the interests of both nations, and based on the rule of law.”